Problems with litter quality and the use of foggers to combat heat can cause birds to become wet and dirty with litter and droppings, which can create a severe contamination problem during the processing as there is a large amount of organic matter in the scalding tank. Contamination of skin and feather follicles by bacterial agents in the water can be reduced by 90% by installing a brush and a chlorine shower before and after the scalding tank. The aim is to reduce the fecal matter present on the skin of the carcasses as much as possible before they reach the chiller.
Scalding tank
The scalding tank is one of Salmonella's most critical contamination points in any plant. Most of these tanks do not have a true counter-flow of water.
Figure 1. Substitution of multiple blanching tanks to dilute organic matter
The water must flow against the direction of the carcasses to wash them effectively. The water flow must be abundant to dilute the organic matter in the tank effectively. A good practice is to install multiple scalding tanks in sequence to dilute the organic matter as much as possible, as illustrated in Figure 1.
The objective is to minimize the amount of organic matter entering the chiller, where the efficiency of an oxidizing agent such as chlorine is drastically reduced as organic material increases.
Continue after advertising.
Control of Salmonella cross-contamination in the scalding tank
Paradoxically, removing organic matter from contaminated birds increases the carcasses' contamination because the removed organic matter contaminates the water in the scalding tank. Therefore it creates an opportunity for cross-contamination.
The use of multiple scalding tanks is very important to reduce contamination.
Some companies reduce the scalding tank temperature from approximately 130°F to 100-110°F. This practice is counterproductive because it encourages organic matter to sink to the bottom of the tank, facilitating contamination with Salmonella, which lives and even multiplies at 100°F.
Evaluation of the scalder's efficiency
Microbiological evaluation of the scalding tank is critical to determine if it is a high-risk point for Salmonella contamination. An example of a scalding tank not operating correctly is illustrated in Figure 3. Possible reasons for this problem include tank temperature being too low, insufficient water supply, and water flowing in the same direction as the carcasses instead of a counterflow
Figure 2. Scalder operating as a bath and not as a counterflow station
Older scalding tanks do not have a reverse flow of water, which is the worst situation for Salmonella control. The situation is aggravated when the processing plant has water supply limitations.
Figure 3. Scalding tank with the inadequate operation and where Salmonella contamination increases as the carcasses pass through it.
Correcting the problem
This problem can be corrected by one or more of the following actions:
Establish a counter-current water flow
Ensure a water temperature of at least 123 ° F
Install a chlorine shower and brush system immediately after bleeding to remove excess stool before scalding
Consider introducing a chemical into the tank
Once these corrections are implemented, it is important to conduct a new microbiological evaluation. Figure 4 illustrates a realistic scenario in a properly operating process plant.
Figure 4. An adequate functioning scalding tank reduces contamination between before and after carcass scalding.
In conclusion, the scald is crucial in implementing interventions that allow effective Salmonella control, especially when microbiological evaluations show that the scalding tank is a major risk point.
Adding chemicals to the scalding tank and managing temperatures
A survey conducted by the United States Poultry and Egg Production Association (USPEA) revealed that approximately 50% of companies use chlorine in the tank, and the other 50% use sodium hypochlorite.
Neither of these products is effective because chlorine is immediately inactivated upon contact with organic matter. Also, sodium hypochlorite does not significantly impact bacterial contamination levels.
Figure 5. Effect of a chemical to sanitize scalding water (reduction of aerobic bacteria)
Figure 6. Effect of a bacteriological index reducing product on the concentration of E. coli (colony forming units) detected in carcasses immediately after scalding.
Figures 5 and 6 illustrate the concentrations of bacteria before and after the blanching when using water without chemicals and when using products to reduce the bacteriological index.
The addition of an acidic disinfectant can be considered, which allows the water temperature to be reduced, although it has a tremendous impact on the efficiency and cost of scalding.
Benefits of using chemicals in the scalding tank
When chemicals are used in the scalding tank, it becomes possible to reduce the water temperature, which can generate the following benefits:
Feather removal is facilitated (when water is acidified)
Less bacterial growth, including Salmonella
Fewer over-scalding problems, especially in the breast muscle
Less energy cost to maintain the temperature of the scalding tank
Less overcooking of subcutaneous fat, allowing better yields
Control of cross-contamination in the plucker
The rubber fingers of plucking machines represent one of the most significant cross-contamination risks in processing plants. They come into direct contact with contaminated surfaces and the rest of the carcasses.
Research carried out at the University of Georgia has determined that the water that accumulates in the bottom of these machines can easily contain up to 1 million bacteria per milliliter, even when using water with a chlorine concentration of 40 ppm. Figure 7 shows the increase in salmonella prevalence during plucking.
Figure 7. Salmonella prevalence before and after plucking
Cross-contamination evaluation in pluckers
Figure 8 illustrates the data resulting from evaluations made in scalding tanks, pluckers, and New York type spray stations, where chlorinated water (controls) or the product "Tasker Blue" were added. The effects were critical as adding "Tasker Blue" resulted in a 2.7 log10 decrease (more than 99%) of bacteria on the carcass surface upon arrival at the re-processing station.
Subsequent studies have shown that this action also dramatically reduces salmonella in carcasses as they exit the chiller.
Figure 8. Aerobic bacteria count before plucker and after pre-processing station.
A significant problem regarding using chemicals in the scalding tank or plucking machine is that managers are not used to investing at any point "at the beginning of the process," but more towards the end. At the beginning of the process, the managers' investment can change rapidly as the legislation changes regarding permissible Salmonella contamination levels.
Chemical disinfection of the processing chain
There are three general methods to reduce pathogenic bacteria in the processing chain except:
Scalding tank
The plucker
The cooling system
Post-Cooling Immersion Systems
Showers
Purpose
The purpose of this equipment is to wash and sanitize the processing equipment that comes into contact with the carcasses so that contamination is not transferred to other stations and that cross-contamination between carcasses is reduced. It is important to have high water pressure and add chemicals such as chlorine. Additionally, chlorine dioxide, peracetic acid, or products such as Zentox or TOMCO (acidified hypochlorous acid) can be used.
Cl Effectiveness
An important limitation to the effectiveness of chlorine is the accumulation of fat or other organic materials on the equipment, which prevents the penetration of the product so that it can destroy bacteria. The bacteria are easily released when they contact the carcasses, which can easily happen with equipment such as brushes dedicated to removing fecal matter after evisceration.
A high-risk point is a machine that removes the crop, as this organ often contains pathogens such as Salmonella and Campylobacter
pH in washing systems
The pH of all washing systems should be kept below 6.5. A quality program should be in place to frequently check the acidity of the water if good control over bacterial contamination is to be maintained. Shower pressure should be checked, and it should be ensured that spray nozzles are not clogged.
Figure 9 illustrates some sprinklers that are not working and others with a very irregular water distribution pattern. Sprinkler nozzles should be positioned to wash the surface of the equipment that comes into contact with the carcasses and the carcasses themselves.
Figure 9. Malfunctioning washing equipment.
Showers for washing inside & outside the carcasses.
These showers should be checked frequently for their levels of:
Chlorine
The concentration of other products
Chemicals
pH
Water pressure & distribution
General recommendations for washing stations
Some general recommendations for these washing stations include:
Maintaining the water pressure.
Maintaining the correct pH level.
Maintaining the proper concentration of chlorine or any other chemical.
Maintaining the adequate distribution of water on the carcasses.
Several chemicals that are being experimentally tested for this purpose include:
Chlorine dioxide
Peracetic acid
Zentox & TOMCO (acidified hypochlorous acid)
Most companies use chlorine in washing systems.
A study conducted by Northcutt et al. –USDA / ARS 2005– suggested that the addition of chlorine to the internal and external washing showers of the carcasses does not have any positive effect on aerobic bacterial counts of E. coli, Salmonella, or Campylobacter on carcasses, since in many circumstances Chlorine is unable to penetrate organic matter if it is too abundant on the carcasses.
