14 May 2026

Testing the One Welfare Framework in Broiler Production

A study examines applying the One Welfare framework to broiler production, integrating welfare, sustainability, and productivity.

David Corredor

SAVE IN THE LIBRARY PDF FILE

The poultry industry faces increasing pressure to balance productivity with ethical, environmental, and social responsibilities. A recent study has tested the One Welfare framework in the context of extensive broiler production, aiming to integrate animal welfare, human well-being, and environmental sustainability into a unified approach. This framework recognizes that welfare is interconnected across species and systems, and that improvements in one area can positively influence others.

Understanding the One Welfare Concept

The One Welfare framework builds upon the principles of One Health, which links human, animal, and environmental health.
However, One Welfare goes further by emphasizing the ethical and social dimensions of food production.
In broiler farming, this means considering not only the birds’ living conditions but also the well-being of farm workers, rural communities, and ecosystems affected by production practices.

Application in Extensive Broiler Systems

Extensive broiler production differs from intensive systems by providing birds with more space, access to natural light, and opportunities for natural behaviors. The study applied One Welfare principles to evaluate:

Animal welfare indicators such as growth rates, mortality, and behavioral expression.
Human welfare aspects including farmer satisfaction, occupational health, and economic viability.
Environmental outcomes like resource use efficiency, biodiversity impact, and carbon footprint.

By analyzing these dimensions together, the framework highlights synergies and trade-offs that traditional single-focus assessments often overlook.

Key Findings

The study revealed several important insights:

Animal welfare improved under extensive systems, with lower stress levels and better leg health compared to intensive production.
Farmer well-being benefited, as producers reported greater job satisfaction and community acceptance when adopting welfare-friendly practices.
Environmental impacts were mixed: while extensive systems reduced some stressors on ecosystems, they required more land and potentially higher feed conversion ratios.

These findings suggest that One Welfare provides a balanced lens for evaluating poultry production, encouraging solutions that optimize across multiple dimensions rather than maximizing only productivity.

Policy makers can use the framework to design regulations that promote holistic sustainability.
Producers gain a tool to assess practices beyond economic metrics, aligning with consumer demand for ethically produced food.
Researchers are encouraged to expand studies into other livestock sectors, ensuring that welfare considerations are consistently applied across agriculture.

Conclusion

Testing the One Welfare framework in extensive broiler production demonstrates its potential to reshape the poultry industry. By linking animal welfare, human well-being, and environmental sustainability, the framework offers a pathway toward more responsible and resilient food systems. While challenges remain, particularly in balancing land use and efficiency, the study underscores that welfare is not a separate issue but a shared responsibility across all levels of production.