Welfare of ducks and geese in farming systems has become a central concern globally. Recent evaluations by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and peer‑reviewed research provide complementary perspectives on how husbandry practices affect these waterfowl. Together, they underline the urgent need for improved housing, enrichment, and management to safeguard bird health and meet ethical standards1.
EFSA’s 2023 opinion was the first comprehensive assessment of duck and goose welfare on farms. It focused on domestic ducks, Muscovy ducks, mule hybrids, and domestic geese. The evaluation excluded practices such as feather collection, foie gras overfeeding, and hunting rearing, concentrating instead on breeding and meat production systems1.
EFSA emphasized that welfare risks are strongly linked to space allowance, floor quality, nesting facilities, and access to open water. Recommendations included providing three‑dimensional space per bird, environmental enrichment, and improved nesting design.
Complementing EFSA’s findings, recent peer‑reviewed studies highlight how housing systems and management practices directly influence waterfowl welfare. Research shows that ducks and geese have strong behavioral needs for swimming, foraging, and social interaction. Systems that restrict water access or limit exploratory behavior lead to stress, feather damage, and reduced immune function2.
The literature also points to nutritional and environmental factors:
These studies argue for integrated welfare frameworks that combine biological needs with production efficiency, aligning with the EU’s Farm to Fork strategy2.
Both EFSA and scientific reviews converge on the need for systemic changes in waterfowl farming. Practical measures include:
Such interventions not only improve welfare but also support sustainable production and consumer trust in poultry products.
The combined evidence from EFSA and academic research underscores that current farming systems often fail to meet ducks’ and geese’s behavioral and physical needs. By adopting science‑based recommendations—especially regarding space, water access, and enrichment—producers can significantly enhance welfare outcomes while aligning with evolving regulatory and ethical expectations1,2.
Sources:
Subscribe now to the poultry technical magazine
AUTHORS

Newcastle Disease: One Hundred Years On, Why Transmission Control Matters More Than Ever
Mustafa Seckin Sandikli
Egg Size Versatility in Nick Chick – Part I
H&N Technical Department
Interview with Khaled Abdel Nasser Awwad
Khaled Abdel Nasser Awwad
When the Supply Chain Breaks: Poultry Prices and the Economics of Maritime Disruption in the Middle East
Dima Chatila
Reovirus Infections in the Broiler Industry
Edgar O. Oviedo Rondón
Egg Condensation in Hatcheries: A Hidden Risk for Embryo Development, Hatchability and Chick Quality
Rasel Ahmed
From Chat to Farm Insight: Bridging the Social Data Gap in Indonesian Broiler Farming
Setiawan Guntarto
Labor Shortage in the Poultry Industry: Potential Solutions
Edgar O. Oviedo Rondón
A Comparison of Soybean Meal from Different Origins in Terms of Nutrient Composition, Amino Acid Profile, and Protein Quality
Güner GÖVENÇ
When Algorithms Start to Control Feed Composition
Henri E. Prasetyo DVM. M.Vsc