
Mycotoxins Biomarkers, Questions and Answers
They are molecules derived from mycotoxins that initially entered the host orally and were subsequently transported and transformed in the livers of animals and humans.
When the host gets in contact with these toxic substances, the natural physiological response consists on making an attempt to reduce their toxicity by breaking them down and trying to produce less harmful substances. The objective is elimination from the body through natural secretions such as sweat, urine, milk, etc.
Less often, as is the case with zearalenone (ZEN), the metabolites produced by poultry and swine can be more toxic than the original toxin.
A practical and important example emphasizing the detection of metabolites in animal production is the identification of M1 in milk, a metabolite of aflatoxin (AFL) that may cause cancer in humans.
In the case of T-2 toxin, it can be converted in the farmland into a metabolite named HT-2, which is detected in feed analyses of grains and feed.
Both T-2 toxin and HT-2 are characterized by producing oral lesions in the mouth of chickens. The conversion of T-2 toxin into HT-2 does not significantly affect the toxicity level.
Not all the metabolites detected under commercial poultry production cause damage. It depends on the species evaluated and the concentration detected in the feed.
Unfortunately, the detection of metabolites is not consistent, and it is not easy to make an exact extrapolation to calculate what level of mycotoxins was ingested to yield the levels of metabolites detected in blood or urine.
Commercial poultry can efficiently metabolize it into DON-3-sulfate in the liver and intestines through the action of the intestinal microflora, followed by rapid excretion.
This is an example of a mycotoxin that is biotransformed into a metabolite more potent than the original.
Two metabolites associated with its estrogenic effect are alpha (α) zearalenol (ZAL) and beta (β) ZAL.
Given that commercial poultry convert this mycotoxin primarily into β-ZAL, they are less susceptible to the estrogenic effects it causes.
Capable of blocking the formation of sphingolipid complexes (fats circulating in the bloodstream) at the hepatocyte level by inhibiting the enzymes necessary for their transformation.
Since FUMs do not cause significant macroscopic (gross) damage in the liver, target organ, of chickens fed 100 ppm under experimental conditions; it is necessary to establish the SA/SO ratio to demonstrate that FUMs were present in the feed used in the trial.
IS THERE A CORRELATION BETWEEN THE CONCENTRATION OF METABOLITES IN BLOOD SERUM OR URINE AND THE CONCENTRATION OF MYCOTOXINS IN THE FEED?
In some species, there is a positive correlation. The higher the intake, the higher the detection level in blood serum or urine.
In commercial poultry, this correlation is, in many cases, highly irregular because poultry has a lower capacity for intestinal absorption of mycotoxins following oral ingestion, and the rate of excretion is faster and more efficient.
Mycotoxins are rapidly metabolized and excreted by poultry, in some cases within 24 hours. Samples must be collected while the birds are ingesting the contaminated feed or within a few hours after ingestion, so it is difficult to predict under commercial conditions when is the right time.
In the case of broiler breeders-flocks generally eating for only 3 to 5 hours throughout the day due to feed restriction, the ideal approach would be to wait several hours after they have been fed to collect blood or urine samples.
WHAT LABORATORY METHOD IS USED TO MEASURE METABOLITES IN BLOOD SERUM OR URINE?
LC-MS/MS (liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry) is often used.
IS THE DETECTION OF METABOLITES OF EMERGING MYCOTOXINS SUCH AS TENUAZONIC ACID (TA), ENNIATINS, AND BEAUVERICIN IMPORTANT?
Various reports show that they can be detected in commercial feed consumed by poultry around the world.
In an old scientific study published in 1978, poor performance was reported in broiler chickens after feeding relatively high doses of these mycotoxins for three weeks.
In conclusion, the detection of metabolites in the blood or urine of commercial poultry is a valuable tool that can help us determine the animals’ actual exposure.
Table 1: Effect of FUMs and two feed additives administered for 21 days to broiler chickens on the sphinganine/sphingosine ratio (SA/SO).

Different letters indicate statistical significance between treatments.
Mallmann, C.A. et al. Efficacy of hydrophilic and lipophilic clays against fumonisins in day old broiler chickens. International Poultry Scientific Forum, Atlanta, Georgia, US. January 2024
Subscribe now to the poultry technical magazine
AUTHORS

Newcastle Disease: One Hundred Years On, Why Transmission Control Matters More Than Ever
Mustafa Seckin Sandikli
Egg Size Versatility in Nick Chick – Part I
H&N Technical Department
Interview with Khaled Abdel Nasser Awwad
Khaled Abdel Nasser Awwad
When the Supply Chain Breaks: Poultry Prices and the Economics of Maritime Disruption in the Middle East
Dima Chatila
Reovirus Infections in the Broiler Industry
Edgar O. Oviedo Rondón
Egg Condensation in Hatcheries: A Hidden Risk for Embryo Development, Hatchability and Chick Quality
Rasel Ahmed
From Chat to Farm Insight: Bridging the Social Data Gap in Indonesian Broiler Farming
Setiawan Guntarto
Labor Shortage in the Poultry Industry: Potential Solutions
Edgar O. Oviedo Rondón
A Comparison of Soybean Meal from Different Origins in Terms of Nutrient Composition, Amino Acid Profile, and Protein Quality
Güner GÖVENÇ
When Algorithms Start to Control Feed Composition
Henri E. Prasetyo DVM. M.Vsc